Why the Grand Relativity Theory?

Our universe, as a system, has multidimensional surroundings. We could imagine it as concentric worlds consisting of 3D [ephemeral] material world at the innermost embedded successively by the infinite number of surrounding [energetic] realms having higher and higher dimensions. The grand relativity theory prevails in all of those worlds except absolute (unlimited dimensional "world").

The grand relativity theory holds that the energy conservation law prevails throughout all those relative worlds. As our 3D-world contains energy, any higher world embedding ours should also contain energy. The concept of nothingness in the sense of "something" devoid of energy is a mere human imagination ^a). The biggest blunder that scientists had ever made was their speculation about something created out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo). The Big Bang is one of such misleading popular products.

What most people mean by the creation is, in fact, the split of something preexisting—an example from the empirical reality of the rubbing of a glass rod with a piece of silk. The two kinds of electrification i.e., the positive charge found on the glass rod and an equal negative charge found on the silk, are not created by friction but are only separated.

This kind of split mechanism is what happened in the grand formations of those relative multidimensional worlds. As the energy of a particular world, say nD-world, splits into its positive and negative parts ^b), an (n-1)D-hypersurface ^c) is formed between the two. This kind of splits (spontaneous symmetry breaking) happened successively from the highest dimensional world to the lowest.

At the lowest level, where the split of 4D-world creates a 3D-hypersurface (our 3D-space), at this particular place, the 4D-energy transformed into 3D-matter ^d). Without such separation, the 4D-world would still have undistinguishable dimensions. In such a world, there could be neither present, past nor the future. It is only after the split that space and time are taking place ^e).

Mainstream physicists have wrongly taken such a world (unsplit spacetime), as representing the real world. No wonder Einstein was uncomfortable as the experience of the Now was beyond the reach of the realm of science. Had he known the cause of the problem, he would reconcile his relativity theory with that of quantum.

Without split, there would be neither space nor matter ^f). Matter can only be created and presents in the 3D-hypersurface, not throughout the whole spacetime. The gravity constant (G), one of the fundamental constants in nature, is a sort of hypersurface‘s "interfacial tension." Therefore, the gravity is acting only across the hypersurface, not out of it as what the brane theory postulates.

Physicists were perplexed when the superstring theory demands the multidimensionality of spacetime. They postulated that the extra-dimensions are curly as they refuted the existence of vast and extended multidimensional worlds beyond our conventional 4D-world. They don't want to believe that such extra-dimensions could be temporal as it would lead them to an extremely complicated situation. Nature, alas, has nothing to do with what physicists presume.

The grand relativity theory, however, is coming to secure the problem. It holds that the relativity of the space and time prevails in all of those worlds. The law of physics is invariant under the transformation of space and time no matter how many dimensions a particular world possesses ^g).

Notes:

a)    The multidimensionality of those worlds is nothing but the geometrical manifestation of a spectrum of energies having a different number of dimensions. This gigantic spectrum of cosmic energies is like a spectrum of lights having different frequencies, forming a colorless white light when in a mixture.

b) The symmetry is not a mere aesthetic aspect of nature but a derivative of the conservation law.  The opposite pairing of every existence in nature is one of its logical consequences. The energy is no exception; it inherently consists of positive and negative energy as the relative energy equation E² = m²c⁴ + p²c² indicates. Surprisingly, most physicists are against such a premise.

c)     In the superstring theory, such a hypersurface is called brane, which could have many dimensions.  Biblical Genesis calls it firmament (raqia in Hebrew) embedded between water above and water below. The term of water in this biblical account, undoubtedly referred to as energy. We should notice, however, that in the real world, no surface (including higher-dimensional hypersurface) configuration has a zero thickness (mathematical surface), which most physicists use in their theory. This oversight leads physicists to many annoyance infinity problems. The minimum thickness that nature allows is 10^-33 cm, the Planck distance, below which space and time have no meaning. It is where the quantum phenomenon mingles with the relativity world.

d) Following the energy equation, E=mc². The interactions between the positive and negative energy across through the hypersurface make such transformation appears as reversible. Matters and the hypersurface they abode are created and annihilated back and forth into energy at the rate equal to the speed of light. This weird phenomenon perpetually occurs at such a short time, and distance makes people perplex when they stumble upon the quantum realm.

e)   Space is the [4D]-time smallest unit, just like a point as the smallest part of a line or a surface as a small part of the space.

f)     There was yet no space where matter could exist, and no time where the dynamic action might occur. It was only after the split of such a chaotic world that the order established. Such as the basic principle of most of the ancient creation of mythology around the globe.

g)   For example, a system consisting of 3D-space embedded in 10D-world has the same physical law as that of 9D-space embedded in the same 10D-world. The latter world model represents better than the former as it is more uncomplicated and more comfortable to be resolved.

Why the Grand Relativity Theory?