Why the Grand Relativity Theory?

Our universe, as a system, has multidimensional surroundings. We could imagine it as concentric worlds consisting of 3D [ephemeral] material world at the innermost embedded successively by the infinite number of surrounding [energetic] realms having higher and higher dimensions. The grand relativity theory prevails in all of those worlds except absolute (unlimited dimensional "world").

The grand relativity theory holds that the energy conservation law prevails throughout all those relative worlds. As our 3D-world contains energy, any higher world embedding ours should also contain energy. The concept of nothingness in the sense of "something" devoid of energy is a mere human imagination ^a). The biggest blunder that scientists had ever made was their speculation about something created out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo). The Big Bang is one of such misleading popular products.

What most people mean by the creation is, in fact, the split of something preexisting—an example from the empirical reality of the rubbing of a glass rod with a piece of silk. The two kinds of electrification i.e., the positive charge found on the glass rod and an equal negative charge found on the silk, are not created by friction but are only separated.

This kind of split mechanism is what happened in the grand formations of those relative multidimensional worlds. As the energy of a particular world, say nD-world, splits into its positive and negative parts ^b), an (n-1)D-hypersurface ^c) is formed between the two. This kind of splits (spontaneous symmetry breaking) happened successively from the highest dimensional world to the lowest.

At the lowest level, where the split of 4D-world creates a 3D-hypersurface (our 3D-space), at this particular place, the 4D-energy transformed into 3D-matter ^d). Without such separation, the 4D-world would still have undistinguishable dimensions. In such a world, there could be neither present, past nor the future. It is only after the split that space and time are taking place ^e).

Mainstream physicists have wrongly taken such a world (unsplit spacetime), as representing the real world. No wonder Einstein was uncomfortable as the experience of the Now was beyond the reach of the realm of science. Had he known the cause of the problem, he would reconcile his relativity theory with that of quantum.

Without split, there would be neither space nor matter ^f). Matter can only be created and presents in the 3D-hypersurface, not throughout the whole spacetime. The gravity constant (G), one of the fundamental constants in nature, is a sort of hypersurface‘s "interfacial tension." Therefore, the gravity is acting only across the hypersurface, not out of it as what the brane theory postulates.

Physicists were perplexed when the superstring theory demands the multidimensionality of spacetime. They postulated that the extra-dimensions are curly as they refuted the existence of vast and extended multidimensional worlds beyond our conventional 4D-world. They don't want to believe that such extra-dimensions could be temporal as it would lead them to an extremely complicated situation. Nature, alas, has nothing to do with what physicists presume.

The grand relativity theory, however, is coming to secure the problem. It holds that the relativity of the space and time prevails in all of those worlds. The law of physics is invariant under the transformation of space and time no matter how many dimensions a particular world possesses ^g).

Notes:

a)    The multidimensionality of those worlds is nothing but the geometrical manifestation of a spectrum of energies having a different number of dimensions. This gigantic spectrum of cosmic energies is like a spectrum of lights having different frequencies, forming a colorless white light when in a mixture.

b) The symmetry is not a mere aesthetic aspect of nature but a derivative of the conservation law.  The opposite pairing of every existence in nature is one of its logical consequences. The energy is no exception; it inherently consists of positive and negative energy as the relative energy equation E² = m²c⁴ + p²c² indicates. Surprisingly, most physicists are against such a premise.

c)     In the superstring theory, such a hypersurface is called brane, which could have many dimensions.  Biblical Genesis calls it firmament (raqia in Hebrew) embedded between water above and water below. The term of water in this biblical account, undoubtedly referred to as energy. We should notice, however, that in the real world, no surface (including higher-dimensional hypersurface) configuration has a zero thickness (mathematical surface), which most physicists use in their theory. This oversight leads physicists to many annoyance infinity problems. The minimum thickness that nature allows is 10^-33 cm, the Planck distance, below which space and time have no meaning. It is where the quantum phenomenon mingles with the relativity world.

d) Following the energy equation, E=mc². The interactions between the positive and negative energy across through the hypersurface make such transformation appears as reversible. Matters and the hypersurface they abode are created and annihilated back and forth into energy at the rate equal to the speed of light. This weird phenomenon perpetually occurs at such a short time, and distance makes people perplex when they stumble upon the quantum realm.

e)   Space is the [4D]-time smallest unit, just like a point as the smallest part of a line or a surface as a small part of the space.

f)     There was yet no space where matter could exist, and no time where the dynamic action might occur. It was only after the split of such a chaotic world that the order established. Such as the basic principle of most of the ancient creation of mythology around the globe.

g)   For example, a system consisting of 3D-space embedded in 10D-world has the same physical law as that of 9D-space embedded in the same 10D-world. The latter world model represents better than the former as it is more uncomplicated and more comfortable to be resolved.

Why the Grand Relativity Theory?

Observe Oil On Water

With the premises that we have previously put forward, we wish to revisit the ancient concepts of cosmology and verify whether they are logical or merely fairy tales.

In order to properly comprehend the ancient myths related to cosmology and cosmogony, we have first to set our mind to higher-dimensional frameworks. It is the golden key required to open the secret of ancient creation myths.

Heavens and earth are the basic notions that frequently quoted in the ancient myth. Most people narrowly interpret these notions as the skies and the planet earth. What the ancients meant with these notions were much broader. They mean as the relativity of a pairing. The heavens might represent something higher, active, the provider; while the earth something lower, passive, the receiver.

The most ancient concept of cosmology can be traced far back in history to the era before Flood. Enmenduranki, a wise king who reigned in the city of Siphar in Babylon gave us a very technical clue on the fundamental concept of cosmology. To comprehend cosmology correctly, he merely asked his people a simple thing … to observe oil on water. 

 The anthropologists lightly interpret this message as a lesson about ancient medicine ingredients. However, far from that, it is the golden key that we have searched for so long to open the secret of the universe. What the king wanted us to observe was the oil and water interface. He did not mean the regular oil and water, but the higher dimensional one. In the four-dimensional framework, for example, the interface would be three-dimensional. His clear message was that our three-dimensional space is nothing but the interface that splits the four-dimensional spacetime in two. In ancient language, the two halves of the spacetime are called heavens and the interface earth.

Genesis also used this kind of cosmology description. It describes the heavens by using the notion of water above and water below and the earth firmament. The term of the firmament in the Genesis is the translation of "raqia," the Hebrew word whose root means the gold leaf that is hammered very thin. This notion of raqia is thus concordance with Enmenduranki’s oil and water’s interface which is very thin indeed. The Qur'an refers to this interface: barzakh. In our modern time, the physicists introduce the concept of "brane" but still in the development proses. The thickness of such firmament (space) is 10^-33 cm. No goldsmith in the world can hammer a piece of gold so thin, not even in Moses time.

We may wonder how can such ancient societies were capable of delivering messages with such a high technicality which modern people could not understand.

References:

1.      Sitchin, Zecharia:" When Time Began," Avon Books, p84, New York, 1993

2.      Friedman, R.E.:" Commentary on the Torah," Harper, San Fransisco, 2001

3.      Randall, Lisa:" Warped Passage," Harper Perennial, New York, 2005

Observe Oil On Water

Genesis' Firmament

Hardly anybody is aware that the technical recount about the nature of the universe can be traced back far in time to the dawn of the history. Based on the scheme corresponding with the King Lists compiled by Sumerian and Babylonian scribed about 2000 B.C., we can find the respectable king under the name of En-me-en-dur-an-na (Enmenduranki) who was believed to know about the secret of heavens, as the seventh ruler in the Mesopotamian dynasties reigning before the Flood1.

Enmenduranki was believed to have ascended into heaven, learned all the secrets of divination and thereby became the source of all human knowledge. The legend tells that while he was in the divine assembly, he was set on a large throne of gold and shown how to observe oil on water …2

It seems so straightforward that nobody must spend so many endeavors only to get such a simple thing. It was elementary teaching indeed, but hitherto nobody comprehends it, and so the knowledge of heavens remains buried in secret.

Let us talk a little bit more technical. Having an oil-water mixture, we observe that the oil and water are separated by a very thin surface (interface) which is a little bit tenser than the surroundings because of the effect of something we know as the interfacial tension.

Now, let us concentrate on this interface and compared it with the Genesis' firmament:

"And God said, "Let there be a space within the water, and let it separate between water and water." So God made the space, and it separated between the water that was under and the water that was above the space" (Genesis 1:6-7)3.

Fig. 1. Interpretation of the firmament as a 3-dimensional interface in a 4-dimensional frame of reference

The interpretation of the notions of Enmenduranki’s interface and Genesis' firmament is the same which is the space. This particular interface is three-dimensional and, therefore, what Enmenduranki meant by the oil and water are nothing but four-dimensional fluids. By the same token, what Genesis means by water is nothing but four-dimensional fluid.

The word space or more precisely firmament in English is the translation of the Hebrew word of “raqia." The root of this word refers to how a goldsmith hammers gold leaf very thin3. This connotation further supports the “technical” depiction of the space as a very thin interface just like what Enmenduranki did.

It suggests that everything in nature, space or higher dimensional hyperspace included, must have a thickness; otherwise, it would vanish into thin air. The consequence of this is that space [or hyperspace] must always be embedded in the higher dimensional surrounding(s), or else the former would have no thickness at all and would be completely flat.

We can draw other information that is related to the geometry of Genesis firmament can from Summerians ideas about Cosmos. For the Sumerians, the universe was tripartite structure – heaven, earth, and the netherworld. It is unmistakably comparable to Enmenduranki’s oil, interface wand water or the Genesis' water above, firmament and water below, respectively.  The Sumerians also used the word 'tin' representing the "metal of heaven." It is the oldest version of the Genesis firmament. According to S.N. Kramer, it may be that the Sumerians thought that the floor of heaven was made of tin or some comparable metals2. It is the one example of inaccurate interpretations which downgraded valuable ancient knowledge.

Do we know how thin our space is? Space's thickness should not be zero but a little bit thicker. Based on the current knowledge, we may put forward the number of 10-33 cm, the Planck distance, as the minimum thickness, below which no tangible thing would exist, only energy does. No skillful goldsmith could hammer the gold leaf so thin, not even in Moses magical time.

Why did the ancients talk about a very thin gold, tin or another comparable leaf of metals? The answer is because this very thin interface is the only place where material things are created giving an appearance as though it is a large piece of thin solid gold.

So how about Genesis' four-dimensional water or Enmenduranki’s four-dimensional oil and water? What is their actual physical reality? At everybody surprise, the answer is that it is nothing but the [four-dimensional] energy. The water above the firmament and the water below the firmament is the ancient representation of the opposite elements of energy: the positive and negative energies.

This elucidation about the creation as the act of separating a preexisting thing ("water" or energy) instead of creation out of nothing naturally raises a critical question. Which one represents the truth: Genesis Cosmology or Big Bang? The answer is the former.

References:

1.  Barmachi, Faraj: Treasures of the Iraq Museum, Iraq Ministry of Information, Baghdad, 1976.

2.     Wright, J.E.: The Early History of Heaven, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.

3.     Friedman, R.E.: Commentary on the Torah, Harper San Francisco, New York, 2001

Genesis' Firmament