The superstring theory
indicates for the first time the existence of multidimensional universes. It is
supposed to be able to provide a comprehensive explanation of all known
physical phenomena and answers the questions that the Big Bang theory cannot
do: What happened before the creation (Big Bang)? Why did the universe explode?
According to the superstring theory the
universe initially existed in ten dimensions. However, because the
ten-dimensional universe was unstable a), it creaked into two
pieces, i.e. a four- and a six-dimensional universe 1. The ordinary
four dimensions well extended while the other six extra dimensions shrunk and
curled to an incredibly small size (10-33 cm), the reason why humans
can not reach it.
Most physicists have
deeply penetrated the mathematical aspect of the theory, but when come to
translate it into physical reality it happened that they did it very lightly
and carelessly. How come that a ten-dimensional body can be split in two to get
a four- and a six-dimensional body? Surprisingly, nobody challenges and fixes such
a bizarre idea. The perturbation theory, or whatever theory it is, would
certainly fail to break a ten-dimensional body down to a four- and a
six-dimensional body.
Let take an example of a
three-dimensional body, say a cube of cheese. If we split it in two, indeed we
did not get a thin piece of cheese and a fiber-like cheese (Figure-1A). In
order to get a fiber-like form, we should make a series of slices; the first
slices produce thin pieces of cheese, and the subsequent slices produce fibers
of cheese (Figure-1B).
Now, how do we get a
four-dimensional universe from the original ten-dimensional one? As the string
theory postulated, the original ten-dimensional universe was so unstable that
it broke in two parts. However, instead of creating one four- and one six-dimensional
universe, a nine-dimensional universe was created in between the two separated
parts of the original universe b). A series of subsequent splits
took place successively in a similar way from higher down to the
lower-dimensional universe.
In the end, we have a
total of seven universes c), the one embedding the other in a
successive lowering order of their dimensions.
As such, there is a ten-dimensional universe at the outermost embedding
nine-dimensional one, the later embedding eight-dimensional one and so forth.
At the end of the series we get the four-dimensional universe embedding a
rotating ephemeral three-dimensional space, where we live in, perpetually
appearing and disappearing across it (Figure-2) d).
Each universe contains
the qualities and interactions of the one above, so that each descending level
of the universe is in turn under more laws, more complex, and having much more
varieties of kinds of stuff. It is the underlying purpose of the grand
unification which hardly any physicist is aware. Regressing such cosmic
creation process to the original condition of the ten-dimensional universe
would give us a much simple physical law with fewer quantum kinds of stuff in
it e).
Why, then, we cannot
directly experience these extra higher-dimensional worlds? Just because the
extra dimensions are temporal, not curly spatial dimensions as what the
superstring theory hypothesizes. Each universe has its owned light f)
with its corresponding speed (ci), Planck constant (hi)
and gravity constant (Gi), depending on the degree of its
dimensions.
The brane theory, as the
extension of the superstring theory, should be adjusted accordingly. We better
regard a brane as an interface lies between two [liquid-like] bodies, instead
of a piece of paper floating in thin air. The brane’s dimensions which extend
along its surface are spatial and off of it temporal.
The gravity fields
propagate along the surface of the brane and not in the direction off of it as
the brane theorists hypothesize 2. We should, therefore, regard
parallel branes as two sides of the same brane; otherwise, they coexist in
different time which is absurd.
Notes:
a) The superstring theory cannot elaborate on the reason why such a
universe is inherently unstable. The bold answer to that is that the energy
intrinsically consists of the opposites, the positive and negative energy.
These two parts tend to segregate arousing [rotational] opposite motions within
and eventually the universe creaks into two pieces.
b) We may easily imagine this phenomenon as a separation of oil and
water creating an interface in between. However, instead of three-dimensional,
we have here ten-dimensional oil-water system.
c) The ancient term of such worlds was the seven heavens
d) The knowledge of such cosmic structure has been known since the
antiquity but degraded as time evolves to become just that of the planetary
orbits of our solar system. The conflicting misinterpretation of such gigantic
macro-cosmic concept, which was beyond both the church and Galileo's
imagination, had tragically taken Galileo's life.
e) Peter Freund, one of the pioneers, worked in multidimensional
space, even though he did not know about the geometrical structure of such
worlds, accurately stated that the laws of nature become simpler and elegant
when formulated in higher dimensions.
f) In the ancient relative term: light upon lights.
References:
1. Kaku, M.:" Hyperspace," Anchor Books, Doubleday, New York,
1994, p. 195, 207.
2. Randall, L.:" Warped
Passage," Harp
No comments:
Post a Comment